|
||
![]() |
The Beaker Period 2500 - 1700 BC | |
Return to Beauforts main Display Display Contents Beauforts, North Foreland Avenue Link - The skeleton Condition Sex Age Stature The skull An abnormality The spine Leg bones |
Beauforts, North Foreland
Avenue Link - The skeleton ![]() |
|
Scales in
0.5 metre divisions |
The human remains were subjected to specialist analysis by the Late Trevor Anderson and J. Andrews. The information below has been summarised from their report (Anderson and Andrews 2005). | |
![]() |
Condition The skeleton was largely
complete, though the majority of the ribs and
the feet bones had not survived.
Osseous
pathology (evidence for disease gained from its effects on the bones)
was confined to vertebral degeneration.
Top
The
narrow greater sciatic
notch
suggested a possible male, but the frontal and occipital bone
morphology (front and back areas of the skull), plus the size of the
mastoid process (the jaw) and supported by
observations on the long bones led to the conclusion that the remains
were probably female.
|
|
![]() |
Age |
|
![]() |
||
The skull Her
oral health was poor and she had suffered from advanced periodontal
disease, abscesses (evidence of four) and widespread ante-mortem
(before-death) tooth-loss.
|
||
![]() |
A particular
abnormality on the skull A small, smooth-edged
aperture in the left parietal bone of the cranium
represented an atypically located vascular foramen (a hole thought to
transmit
an additional blood vessel and not the result of surgical
intervention).
Anderson notes that apart
from the occurrence of two
similar foramina noted on an Australian Aboriginal skull (Webb and
Thorne 1985), no definite British examples of an anomalous parietal
foramen have been published.
An Anglo-Saxon female from
Kent had
previously been found with a cranial aperture and an almost circular
foramen which was anterior to the lambdoid suture (Anderson and Andrews
1997). Analysis suggested trephination (a surgical intervention) in
that case, though other
diagnoses were also considered.
|
|
![]() |
The spine
Post-cranial osseous pathology was confined to vertebral degeneration. The true level of this was unclear, due to the fragmented and incomplete nature of the spine. Osteophytes and a Schmorl’s node were present however. Both of these are related to mechanical stress and the latter to severe compressional forces. Leg bones Both femora (leg bones) displayed marked medio-latteral flattening (platymeria), which could have been related to mineral or vitamin deficiencies or be a response to mechanical adaption and increased muscular stresses. ‘Allen’s fossa’ (Finnegan
1978) was noted on the left femoral neck, a
trait linked to marked flexion of the hip.
Extreme extension of the
hip
has been related to running down steep hillsides (Angel 1964). Could this condition have
come about
due to activity on the western side of North Foreland Hill (the
steepest in the area)? One may
(perhaps somewhat romantically) envisage our Beaker lady developing
this condition on
the western slopes of the North Foreland promontory, only a
short walk from where she was ultimately buried.
|
|
Natasha
Ransom excavates the Beaker burial |
![]() |
|
Anderson T. and Andrews J.1997. The human bones in Parfitt K. and Brugmann B. The Anglo-Saxon Cemetery on Mill Hill, Deal, Kent. (Medieval Archaeology Monograph Series no.14). London. Appendix II, 230-232. Anderson T. and Andrews J. 2005. The Human Skeleton in Hart P.C. ‘Beauforts’, North Foreland Avenue, Broadstairs, Kent. Trust for Thanet Archaeology report, Part 2. Angel G.L.1964. The reaction area of the femoral neck. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 32, 130-142. Finnegan M. 1978. Non metric variations of the infra cranial skeleton. Journal of Anatomy 125, 23-37. Webb S.G. and Thorne A.G. 1985. A congenital meningocele in prehistoric Australia. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 68, 525-533. |
||
Acknowledgments I should very much like to
acknowledge the work of the Late Trevor Anderson for his analyses of
not only this but many other human skeletons from Thanet (and
further affield).
|
||
The text is the responsibility of the author; the photographs are by the author unless otherwise stated. | ||
Paul
Hart Version 1 - Posted 16.12.06 |
||
All
content © Trust for Thanet Archaeology
|